So, the wait is over and the new Ukrainian government is established. The pro-Russian prime mininster Victor Yanukovich is out, and Yulia Tymoshenko is in. Now Tymoshenko must keep the promise to conduct a criminal investigation into the gas deal Ukraine has signed with Russia, and introduce tougher anti-corruption measures. Should she be succesful, Ukraine will come out as a winner.
According to Freedom House Rating of Independent Countries Ukraine is at par with India as free countries where democracy rules. Granted, Romania and Bulgaria are more democratic, according to the rating, but it is encouraging to see free Ukraine as much as it pains to see authoritarian rule of Putin in Russia.
Indeed, Russia shares its rating with Pakistan on the other end of the spectrum. Let me quote recent article which appeared in The Economist:
The re-election of General Pervez Musharraf as Pakistan’s president on October 6th was “fair and transparent”. THat was the considered judgement of his chief sidekick, the prime minister. “Unrepresentative, rigged and at gunpoint” would have been nearer the mark.
In Russia it is no longer a question whether the election will be democratic. NY Times published an article in which it describes how the Russian government violates the law and prohibits opposition parties from participation. Inofficial sources, such as blogs, provide countless examples of such violations.
Yet, despite the negative press that both Putin and Musharraf received in the past few days, the situation in Russia and Pakistan are not much different than equally ranked Thailand, which despite its lack of democratic freedoms, enjoys a steady stream of tourists.
China and Belarus shared an even worse position in the rating, matching Zimbabwe. Demonstrations in Belarus last year aired by international TV networks further supported the notion of Belarusian to be an oppressive regime. Yet we see the continuous growth of foreign direct investment into China, the country where, as it is widely known, elections do not take place, and the leader of the Communist Party is expected to name its heir. Yet, acccording to United Nations, China was the world’s fourth-largest recipient of foreign direct investment in 2006 after the U.S., U.K. and France.
Why then Ukrainian FDI are not as impressive? IN 2005, the year after the Orange Revolution, the FDI in Ukraine were $4.1 Billion. Perhaps, investors value predictability of the authoritarian regime in China over the Ukrainian instability of democracy? The challenge for Ukraine is to stick to its pro-Western path, form a working government and continuing its reforms.